|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Grammar and Linguistics > could or was able to      
			
		 could or was able to  
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Miri75
 
   | 
						
							| could or was able to 
 |  
							| Hi nice people,   Could you tell me which sentence is correct?     A ) HE HAD HURT HIS LEG, SO HE WASN �T ABLE TO WALK VERY WELL      B) HE HAD HURT HIS LEG, SO HE COULDN �T WALK VERY WELL          I saw both of them are correct in "English Grammar in use"(CUP).Do you agree ?  Could you explain the difference?   Thanks in advance
 |  15 Aug 2009      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Kate (kkcat)
 
   | 
						
							| Hello, Well, I think in this case A is correct because I have read about this one aspect: be able to - means physical ability or the ability to do something at the particular time or in a particular situation.
 
 
 
 |  15 Aug 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 karitadeangel
 
   | 
						
							| BOTH sentences are OK! In the negative you have no problem. You can use wasn �t able to and couldn �t in the same way. there �s no difference.
The problem is when you use them in the affirmative. 
 COULD refers to an ability in the past: When I was six I could touch my feet with my hands (I can �t do it any more).
 You can only use COULD in the past for ONE OCCASION when you use it with VERBS OF PERCEPTION (see, smell, hear, etc.): when I got to the house and I could smell something burning.
 
 In those cases when you can �t use COULD (that is to say, when you are talking about a particular situation in the past and you are not referring to the senses) you use BE ABLE TO:
 After studying so hard, I was finally able to pass the make up exam. (NOT I could pass the make up exam)
 
 HOPE IT HELPS!!!! Anyway I �m sure you �ll find this in a grammar book in the part of modals that refer to ability.
 
 =)
 
 Karina
 
 |  15 Aug 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 reeta1
 
   | 
						
							| They �re both right. Couldn �t means being not physically being able to do something. |  15 Aug 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 zailda
 
   | 
						
							| They can be used interchangeably: 
 I couldn �t swim when I was 10.
 I wasn �t able to swim when I was 10.
 
 When referring to a particular time / situation we use be able to instead of can / could:
 
 He had hurt his leg, so he wasn �t able to walk very well.
 
 When the teacher asked me about it yesterday, I wasn �t able to answer.
 
 
 
 |  16 Aug 2009     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |