|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Ask for help > The difference between might have been and could have been     
			
		 The difference between might have been and could have been 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Amandina
 
   | 
						
							| The difference between might have been and could have been 
 |  
							| Dear Teachers, 
 Here�s a grammar question that keeps puzzling me:
 What�s the difference between "He could have stolen my car" and "He might have stolen my car"?
 
 Thank you for your help!
 Cheers,
 Amandina
 
 |  5 Dec 2009      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 RabbitWho
 
   | 
						
							| "He could have stolen my car." 
 2 possible meanings:  
 1. where "could" is acting as a modal the same as "might"  It means maybe he stole my car, I don �t know, I am speculating. 
 2. Where "could" is the past tense of can.  Here the meaning is very different; It means he had the opportunity to steal my car, and he didn �t.  
 
 "He might have stolen my car."  
 Only one possible meaning in modern English: 
 It means maybe he stole my car, I don �t know, I am speculating. 
 
 
 Hope that was clear.  
 *starts singing a Christmas song*  
 "I could have been someone - Well so could anyone... you took my dreams from me, when I first found you!" |  5 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Amandina
 
   | 
						
							| Wow!!!! That makes it very clear! Thanks a lot!!!!! And thank you for the song! I�ll definitely use it. Hugs,
 Amandina
 
 
 
 |  5 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 RabbitWho
 
   | 
						
							| Yay! I �m so glad it helped. :) 
 You don �t have to use the song hee hee, students don �t always love it... but I do! :)  |  5 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			|  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 JudyHalevi
 
   | 
						
							| He could have stolen my car  =  He had the ability, but he didn �t.  Example:  He could have stolen my car, because I left my keys in it, but he didn �t.   He might have stolen my car  =  He might be the one who stole my car. Example:  He might have stolen my car, because he had the opportunity.    from Israel.  Judy    |  6 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 mrjamal
 
   | 
						
							| There is no difference  : "might" and "could "  have the same function when they are used in the modal past perfect tense >"possibility" or "uncertainity" . Thank you. |  6 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 mrjamal
 
   | 
						
							| Sorry Judy but "could " can imply that type of ability but not in this tense Ii guess. |  6 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 cheezels
 
   | 
						
							| Give it up Samantha you are being quite ridiculous and pathetic. That chip on your shoulder about native speakers is very unattractive. Yet again you are rude and insulting to all native speakers here. What exactly is your point.
 
 |  6 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 JudyHalevi
 
   | 
						
							| As a native English speaker, if someone said to me, he could have stolen my car, I would take it to be ability.  If he said, he could have stolen my car, he looks like the guy who did it, then I would take it as a modal.   So MrJamal,  It would depend on the way it was said.     Judy |  6 Dec 2009     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |