|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Grammar and Linguistics > I ´m confused!     
			
		 I ´m confused! 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 stevenji
 
   | 
						
							| I ´m confused! 
 |  
							| There is a multiple choice like this:   Charles was alone at home, with _________ looking after him. A. someone             B. anyone                C. not one               D. no one   The answer is "not one", but I don �t quite understand what �s the difference between "not one" and "no one", and don �t you think "no one" is also proper here?   |  5 Mar 2010      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 roneydirt
 
   | 
						
							| not one is incorrect.  It would be" with no one looking after him." |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 colibrita
 
   | 
						
							| Yep, Roneydirt �s right. No wonder you were confused, Stevenji! |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 mjpa
 
   | 
						
							| Yes, I agree with roneydirt and colibrita. The correct answer is "no one" undoubtely. |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 stevenji
 
   | 
						
							| Hehe:)Than you, I see now. There�re some mistakes in the web. |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 libertybelle
 
   | 
						
							| Roneydirt is correct. The only way the answer could be correct using not one - would be if the sentence said:
 
 Charles was alone at home, with not one single person around to look after him.
 
 
 
 |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 RabbitWho
 
   | 
						
							| "no one" is a word which somehow has never been combined so that it looks like a word. (Or I should say it functions as a word) It is the opposite of "someone". For this reason you often see it misspelled as noone or no-one.
 
 As liberty-belle said it means the same as "not one person" .
 Someone means the same as "one (non-specific) person"
 
 None of us has actually managed to explain the grammar to you yet, perhaps look it up in a grammar book.
 
 "not one" has to go with something, eg. "not one chair, not one table, not one cat, not one person"
 
 |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Zora
 
   | 
						
							| "No" goes with adjectives/plural nouns - "no blue houses are found here". / "no animals are allowed in my house." 
 "Not" - with singular nouns - "Not a house that is blue can be found on this street." / "Not an animal, nor a dirty child may enter my house..."
 
 More or less that is a general rule...
 
 
 
 
 
 |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Mariethe House
 
   | 
						
							| I do like your example, Linda!! "Not an animal, nor a dirty child may enter my house..."
  
 Have a nice week end!!
 
 |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Zora
 
   | 
						
							|  - Mariethe... I was tired and this week, I �ve had "bathroom issues" with my little boys and their dreadful aim!  LOL 
 |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 RabbitWho
 
   | 
						
							| I would prefer "Neither an animal nor a dirty child..." 
 but I had a disagreement about this with someone recently and it turns out the other way is acceptable:
 
 
 Usage Note:  
When using neither  in a balanced construction that negates two 
parts of a sentence, nor  (not or ) must be used in the 
second clause: She is neither able nor (not or) willing to go.  Similarly, 
when negating the second of two negative independent clauses, nor 
 (not or ) must be used: He cannot find anyone now, nor does he
 expect to find anyone in the future; Jane will never compromise with 
Bill, nor will Bill compromise with Jane.  Note that in these 
constructions, nor  causes an inversion of the auxiliary verb and 
the subject (does he ... will Bill ... ). However, when a verb is 
negated by not or never, and is followed by a verb phrase 
that is also to be negated (but not an entire clause), either or 
or nor can be used: He will not permit the change, or (or nor) even consider 
it. In noun phrases of the type no this or that, or is 
actually more common than nor: He has no experience or 
interest (less 
frequently nor interest) in chemistry. Or is also more 
common than nor when such a noun phrase, adjective phrase, or 
adverb phrase is introduced by not: He is not a philosopher or
 a statesman. They were not rich or happy. See Usage Notes at neither, or1. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/NOR
 
 
 
 But anyway that �s straying off the point...
 
 
 |  5 Mar 2010     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |