|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Ask for help > Double comparatives     
			
		 Double comparatives 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Sorcha
 
   | 
						
							| Double comparatives 
 |  
							| I �ve got a doubt and I wonder if someone can help clarifying it. 
 Adjective: well-paid (long adjective)
 Comparative: more well-paid or better paid
 
 so when using the double comparative I assume both
 "some jobs are becoming more and more well-paid" or "some jobs are becoming better and better-paid" are possible. Am I right?
 
 Thanks a lot.
 Sorcha
 
 
 |  3 Nov 2010      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Mariethe House
 
   | 
						
							| better paid!  better known / better dressed/ well is the adjective and should take the comparative form: better
 
 |  3 Nov 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Apodo
 
   | 
						
							| I would use:   some jobs are becoming more and more well paid.   some jobs are becoming much better paid   some jobs are becoming much more well paid   I wouldn �t use better and better paid, but the pay for some jobs is getting better and better.       |  3 Nov 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 el_profe55
 
   | 
						
							| I would use the first one, the other one sounds  a bit strange!!! |  3 Nov 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 NanG
 
   | 
						
							| I would say more and more well-paid. As I would also say more and more good-looking. 
 Isn �t it the same "rule" ?
 
 =)
 
 
 
 |  3 Nov 2010     
					
                     |  |  
			|  |  
	
	   |