| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Entalio
 
   | 
						
							| to get on (well) 
 |  
							| I haven �t been here for so long. I need your help. to get on means to have good relations. we can say also to get on well and it still means the same. Nevertheless how can I say not to have good relations? Is there any phrasal or expression that sounds kind of same? Thx in advance. |  13 Jan 2011      
					
					 |  | 
		
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Kate (kkcat)
 
   | 
						
							| to get on badly, not to get on well - are correct if I �m not mistaken 
 :)
 
 |  13 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Entalio
 
   | 
						
							| I said so to my students. But unfortunately i think it �s not correct. According to the dictionary to get on means to have smooth relations ( so it �s like having good relations itself). Well is only the addition. So get on badly would not make a sense.. Am I right?  |  13 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Entalio
 
   | 
						
							| I said so to my students. But unfortunately i think it �s not correct. According to the dictionary to get on means to have smooth relations ( so it �s like having good relations itself). Well is only the addition. So get on badly would not make a sense.. Am I right?  |  13 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 MoodyMoody
 
   | 
						
							| This is slightly off-topic, but not too much. In the USA, we say "get along with" or "don �t get along with" to mean having good or bad relationships with people. On our side of the pond, "get on with" something means to hurry up and do it already. |  13 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Entalio
 
   | 
						
							| I said so to my students. But unfortunately i think it �s not correct. According to the dictionary to get on means to have smooth relations ( so it �s like having good relations itself). Well is only the addition. So get on badly would not make a sense.. Am I right?  |  13 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Entalio
 
   | 
						
							| I said so to my students. But unfortunately i think it �s not correct. According to the dictionary to get on means to have smooth relations ( so it �s like having good relations itself). Well is only the addition. So get on badly would not make a sense.. Am I right?  |  13 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Kate (kkcat)
 
   | 
						
							| I would then say :  �we don �t get on/along �...that would make it a perfectly correct phrase. |  13 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 ballycastle1
 
   | 
						
							| In the UK, we use  They don �t get along, They don �t get on and  They don �t get on very well. |  14 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Apodo
 
   | 
						
							| This is how I use this phrase:   Get on with your work!  = Do your work now instead of talking etc. 
Sorry, I can �t talk now I have to get on with marking these tests.   He gets on very well with his mother-in-law.   He doesn �t get on with his mother-in-law, so he doesn �t like it when she visits.   He and his brother don �t get on very well.   They get on really well together.   She is hard to get along with because she argues all the time. |  14 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 douglas
 
   | 
						
							| I feeling tells me:    doesn �t get on (too) well with..  (definitely not a US English though)   but I can �t support it. |  14 Jan 2011     
					
                     |  |