|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Ask for help > Is it correct?     
			
		 Is it correct? 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 t.javanshir
 
   | 
						
							| Is it correct? 
 |  
							| Can "when encountered" be correct in this sentence? 
 Members of the public are therefore advised to exercise extreme caution when encountered these individuals.  
 I was making a test and was wondering if I could include when encountered as an incorrect alternative. The original sentence was this: 
 Members of the public are therefore advised to exercise extreme caution if
encountering these individuals.  
 what about "as encounter"? 
 |  13 Jul 2011      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 jasmine khan
 
   | 
						
							| Hi!
 
 I don �t think it �s correct because in this sentence  �encounter � refers to something/ an action that may happen more than once, generally, often or repeatedly n we use use present form of the verb in such a case while past form of the verb  is used to refer to an action  completed in the past n is often done once not  repeatedly or more than once. So to me "when encountered" in this context seems incorrect ,the correct version would be when encounter.
 
 Regards
 Jasmine
 
 |  13 Jul 2011     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 lshorton99
 
   | 
						
							| Hi! 
 I �m sorry to tell you that  �when encountered �  �as encounter � and  �when encounter � would not be correct in this case.
 
 Jasmine makes some good points in that it is an action that may happen more than once but we can �t use a simple present tense here because the original sentence  �if encountering � is a particple clause. We cannot use a past participle because this is something which is true in the present.
 
 Another note is that, in this case,  �if � and  �when � change the meaning slightly.  �If � suggests nothing more than a possibility whereas  �when � implies that these people are likely to be encountered at some point.  �As encounter � - I can �t see any way in which this makes sense - sorry!
 
 The sentence can be rewritten in one of the following ways:
 
 �Members of the public are therefore advised to exercise extreme caution upon encountering these individuals. � ( �upon � would also change the meaning slightly)
 
 �Members of the public are therefore advised to exercise extreme caution should they encounter these individuals. � (using  �should � and an inversion allows a verb form to follow)
 
 �Members of the public are therefore advised to exercise extreme caution if they encounter these individuals. � (the participle clause is replaced by the less complex subject verb form)
 
 �Memebers of the public are therefore advised to exercise extreme caution should/if these individuals be encountered. � (the only way a past participle can be used is as part of a passive verb form).
 
 I hope that helps!
 
 Lindsey
 
 
 
 |  13 Jul 2011     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 douglas
 
   | 
						
							| Yes, "When encountered" can be used as an INCORRECT answer in this sentence. |  13 Jul 2011     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |