| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 angela#anaconda
 
   | 
						
							| have worked since 1990   vs  have nee working since 1990 
 |  
							|   Dear colleagues,   I was wondering what the difference was between: "I �ve worked for IBM since 1990" and "I �ve been working for IBM since 1990" I know we can use both but which one would you use more naturally?    Is there a difference in meaning here?   Thank you guys! |  5 Feb 2012      
					
					 |  | 
		
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 ueslteacher
 
   | 
						
							| 1) Pr Per Cont - to emphasize duration; 2) Pr Per - emphasis on completion; 3) Pr Per Cont - could mean it �s temporarily; 4) Pr Per - it �s a permanent job? 
 Let �s see what others think. Sophia  |  5 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 almaz
 
   | 
						
							| To paraphrase Geoff Pullum, if you added "....and now it �s time to party!", your continued employment with the company - and a decent pension - may well be at issue. |  5 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 yanogator
 
   | 
						
							| I agree with Sophia. The way I usually explain it is that the continuous tenses emphasize the process and the time involved. "I have worked for them since 2000" is a simple statement of fact.
 "I have been working for them since 2000" is talking about the time and work, rather than just giving the amount of time.   Bruce |  5 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 almaz
 
   | 
						
							| And...which one would you use more naturally? 
 I know this is a constant (and usually justified) complaint but, perhaps if Angela gave us a context...? |  5 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  | 
		
			|  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 PhilipR
 
   | 
						
							| Some grammar books say that the present perfect simple and present perfect continuous can be used interchangeably with the verbs LIVE and WORK. 
 I agree with Almaz that context would be useful. |  6 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 marie.marron
 
   | 
						
							| But isn �t the difference that if you say: 
"I �ve worked for IBM since 1990" you recently ended your work there and "I �ve been working for IBM since 1990" you still work there? |  6 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Apodo
 
   | 
						
							| @marie.marron   I �ve worked for IBM since 1990"  - This doesn �t indicate that you no longer work there. 
If you no longer work there you would say: I worked for IBM from 1990 until 2007.  You would not use �since �. You can say: I haven �t worked there since 2007.   Since indicates it is still happening. |  6 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  | 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 angela#anaconda
 
   | 
						
							| There is no particular context here and I thank you all for your answers! May the force be with you!   |  6 Feb 2012     
					
                     |  |