|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Grammar and Linguistics > OBJECT OR NOT OBJECT     
			
		 OBJECT OR NOT OBJECT 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 sol_landia
 
   | 
						
							| OBJECT OR NOT OBJECT 
 |  
							| I would like you to help me with this sentence... 
 We waited for me for 3 hours 
 Is there any object in this sentence or not?? I �m really confused, I appreciate you could help me ... 
 Thanks |  4 Oct 2012      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 yanogator
 
   | 
						
							| First, there is a problem with the sentence, since "we" wouldn �t wait for "me". However, to answer your question, there isn �t a direct object, but "me" is the object of the preposition "for", and "hours" is the object of the other preposition "for".   Bruce |  4 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 ueslteacher
 
   | 
						
							| The sentence is confusing... shouldn �t it be "They had (have) been waiting/they had(have) waited for me for three hours" And in this case the "for me" is an indirect object. 
 @ grammar experts: isn�t "for three hours" an adverbial modifier of time? (that�s what I�ve been taught but I�d love to know the expert opinion) Sophia |  4 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 sol_landia
 
   | 
						
							| I wanted to say HE waited for me |  4 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 yanogator
 
   | 
						
							| Yes, Sophia, "for 3 hours" is an adverbial phrase.   The sentence is correct in the simple past, if it describes an event entirely in the past.   Why is he so angry? I was late for our date, and he waited for me for three hours.   I �m not sure, but I think only a noun or pronoun (alone) can be an indirect object. I �d appreciate it if someone else would verify that:   He gave me the ball.   ball - direct object, me - indirect object He gave the ball to me.    ball - direct object, no indirect object, me - object of the preposition "to"   Bruce |  4 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 papadeli
 
   | 
						
							| The object of a  preposition is a noun or a pronoun.
This is important because the object of a preposition is always in the  �objective case �, and pronouns change 
in this case. Examples:
 
 Can you give the ball to him?
 ("He" changes 
to "him" in the objective case.)
 
 I went to the cinema with them.
 ("They" changes 
to "them" in the objective case.)
    The word �whom� is the objective case of �who�.
   Examples:
 Andy saw the scouts, at least one of whom was armed, through the mist.
 ("Whom" - objective 
case after the preposition "of")
 
 Against whom did you protest if there was nobody 
present?
 ("Whom" - objective case after the preposition "against")
 
 
 Greetings from Greece, |  4 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |