|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Grammar and Linguistics > If I were you...     
			
		 If I were you... 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 andreaewa
 
   | 
						
							| If I were you... 
 |  
							| As I can see today you are having fun with grammar so my question is: Do you know why we should use were after the pronoun I in the if sentences? 
 
 |  23 Jan 2009      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 xiles31
 
   | 
						
							| Hi! I found a pretty good explanation here about the use of subjunctive: http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/061.html |  23 Jan 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 MissMelissa12
 
   | 
						
							| I shall say that we should use   ��I were �� because it is  the subjunctive way of the verb TO BE when talking about hipothetical situations (unreal situations, desires) If I were a butterfly (But Iam not a butterfly), I would fly away to where you are now. (hipotethical condition)                                      (imaginary result)   Comparing it to Spanish ( as I see you are from Uruguay) it is the same as using the conditionals : Si yo fuera una mariposa ( condicion ireal)...     I hope I made sense my dear!!!   Miss Melissa.        |  23 Jan 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 gaby_mn
 
   | 
						
							| "According to traditional thought, statements about the conditional future such as �If I were a carpenter . . .� require the subjunctive �were�; but �was� is certainly much more common. Still, if you want to impress those in the know with your usage, use �were� when writing of something hypothetical, unlikely, or contrary to fact. "   In other words, both are correct, but WERE sounds much more sophisticated   |  23 Jan 2009     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |