|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Grammar and Linguistics > A plea for sanity on National Grammar Day     
			
		 A plea for sanity on National Grammar Day 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 almaz
 
   | 
						
							| A plea for sanity on National Grammar Day 
 |  
							| One in the eye for the Grammar Police. Well worth a read: 
 |  4 Mar 2013      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			|  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Zora
 
   | 
						
							| Another bravo! Wholeheartedly agree with the article.
 
 |  4 Mar 2013     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 mvblair
 
   | 
						
							| Thanks for the link, Almaz. I liked the article. 
 I �ve never really understood the obsession that many people have with grammar. I understand that a basic amount of grammar is necessary to learn the language and communicate, but I don �t understand why 21st century schools have this odd compulsion to make teaching object pronouns or conditional pluperfect cornerstones in our language arts programs.
 
 If somebody makes a grammatical mistake, "big deal."
  
 |  4 Mar 2013     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 cunliffe
 
   | 
						
							| It should be  �grocers � apostrophe. � 
 Seriously, the tone of this article is so snide, sneery, scornful and superior, it made me want to gag. And I didn�t actually know there was a National Grammar Day, but I�m pleased it�s March 4th, �cos that�s my birthday!  
 A plea for sanity?!!!! What? Nothing like a nice bit of hyperbole, eh, almaz?  |  4 Mar 2013     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 almaz
 
   | 
						
							| Any grammar must, by definition, be a set of rules, but what so many people are hung up on are those  �zombie rules � which are completely arbitrary and often based on personal preference (like split infinitives and ending a sentence with a preposition). 
 @Lynne    Please enlighten us: what exactly is so "snide, sneery,scornful and superior" about the article? You could start with "snide". |  4 Mar 2013     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 cunliffe
 
   | 
						
							| I don �t know any of these people who who are hung up on  �zombie rules �, I �m afraid. I can �t imagine anyone these days being seriously bothered by split infinitives or ending a sentence with a preposition, this is decades old stuff to be bothered about. 
 As for my string of adjectives, I �m just expressing my opinion and anyone can form their own, without further enlightenment from me.  
 I think there �s a bit of reverse grammar snobbery going on here. |  4 Mar 2013     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 almaz
 
   | 
						
							| And Kory Stamper is entitled to his opinion too. I really can�t see what �s so "snide", "sneery" or, especially, "superior" (quite the opposite, I�d imagine) about his opinions, Lynne. 
 Oh, and Many Happy Returns! |  4 Mar 2013     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 cunliffe
 
   | 
						
							| Fair enough and thank you! Lynne |  5 Mar 2013     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |