|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Concerning worksheets > Descriptions     
			
		 Descriptions 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Minka
 
   | 
						
							| Descriptions 
 |  
							| I have always thought that users are supposed to name and describe the worksheets in a way that would help others choose the ones they need. But when I look at the new contributions there �s a bunch of worksheets called Questions for this exam, Questions for that grade and term, exam for these and these students etc, And the description is no better: I hope you like it, exam questions... Arghhh! Do these users think we �re going to open each and every worksheet to see what they are about? And give them points this way already? Or wait for the preview od ten worksheets? 
 |  26 Dec 2015      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 MoodyMoody
 
   | 
						
							| Poor descriptions, as you allude, hurt the contributor. I agree that the blurbs should describe the subject matter in such a way that the prospective downloader knows what the worksheet/presentation contains. Contributors should also know that poorly-worded descriptions also make potential downloaders think that the work is poorly done, rightly or wrongly. |  26 Dec 2015     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 shvat
 
   | 
						
							| In general, why would other teacher �s test help me?? We never cover the exact same material anyway. |  26 Dec 2015     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 cunliffe
 
   | 
						
							| The thing here is that the previews are pretty good - you can see what is on offer and for me, a description is a little bit superfluous. |  27 Dec 2015     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Minka
 
   | 
						
							| I agree, Cunliffe, but that is just not the point. I think it is not nice not to give a proper description. If you make a test for this and this grade/term/whatever - would it kill you to mention a topic or a grammar structure you included? Not you, but you know... |  27 Dec 2015     
					
                     |  |  
			|  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 cunliffe
 
   | 
						
							| @Minka, yes, fair enough. It �s quite different on islCollective. You have to write 160 characters to describe your ws. |  27 Dec 2015     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 MoodyMoody
 
   | 
						
							|  I personally don �t bother to look at previews unless the description matches something I want. A well-written blurb can make a difference.   As long as we �re talking about descriptions, do we have guidelines for what is considered "elementary," "intermediate," or "advanced"? I �m never quite sure about that.  |  27 Dec 2015     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |