|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Grammar and Linguistics > confusion with negation     
			
		 confusion with negation 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 peace4ever
 
   | 
						
							| confusion with negation 
 |  
							| Negate these sentences 
 I have some doubts about these sentences:
 1- Negate
 
 *) Ahmed does his homework requraly.
 
 my problem is with the word requraly.
 2-Negate keeping the same meaning:
 
 *) Ahmed has always been honest for every one he knows
 
 thanks in advance!
 
     |  11 Apr 2009      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 alex1968
 
   | 
						
							| Hi Peace4ever   requraly?  Do you mean regularly?   Ahmed does his homework regularly-----Ahmed never does his homework. OR   Ahmed doesn �t do his homework regularly.   Ahmed has always been honest to everyone he knows. Ahmed has never been dishonest to anyone he knows.   Are you a student?  If you were a teacher, I think you �d already know these things   |  11 Apr 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 douglas
 
   | 
						
							|   These two sentences have the same meaning:   Ahmed has always been honest to everyone he knows. Ahmed has never been dishonest to anyone he knows. (double negative)   The negative would be:   Ahmed has never been honest to anyone he knows. |  11 Apr 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 peace4ever
 
   | 
						
							| Thanks alot for replying here .. Well, I �m not a student.. I �m a teacher..   But again I knew that it would be negted the  same as you did but still  have some confusion about { reqularly}! thanks again! |  13 Apr 2009     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |