|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Message board > Marking papers - HELP     
			
		 Marking papers - HELP 
		
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Mulle
 
   | 
						
							| Marking papers - HELP 
 |  
							| I am marking exam papers and all of a sudden I have come to worry about abbreviations. Is is correct to write CO2 (carbon dioxide) in a text? The student is supposed to write a speech on climate changes. What would you say when delivering the speech? CO2 or carbon dioxide?     |  16 May 2009      
					
					 |  |  
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 blizzard1
 
   | 
						
							| Dear Mulle 
 I would say carbon dioxide as CO2 sounds the way it �s normally said in DK.
 
 Hugs
 Tisha
 
 |  16 May 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 mena22
 
   | 
						
							| Dear Mulle, I accept that in an informal language context, which is not the case. I would underline CO2.   Good work. Hugs, mena |  16 May 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 evl422
 
   | 
						
							| I have something of a Science background and I �d say that they �re both correct, with the following comments: CO2: If you �re addressing a scientific audience, you �d be more likely to use abbreviations such as this.
 Carbon dioxide: It sounds more formal, but you wouldn �t want to have to repeat it too often - you �d be more likely to switch to CO2 (3 syllables vs. 5) after the audience is clear that you �re talking about carbon dioxide (in the case that they are not familiar with the term).
 
 |  16 May 2009     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 Mulle
 
   | 
						
							| Thank you for your explanation. |  16 May 2009     
					
                     |  |  
	
	   |