ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Ask for help > Using a Youtube video about the Vikings
Using a Youtube video about the Vikings
Celestito
|
Using a Youtube video about the Vikings
|
Dear friends,
I �m trying to work with a video about the Vikings witch I �ve watched in youtube. The problem is that I can �t find the subtittles and it �s been difficult for me to understand some parts of it.
Can anyone help me???
Thanks a lot in advance!!! |
17 Sep 2009
|
|
|
wolfy
|
Sorry the usual sites have nothing. I think you �ll have to script it yourself. I �ll see if I can help a bit. :) |
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
here �s the intro: 00:00 to 01:26
At the end
of the 8th century a wave of violence hit the coastal settlements of Northern Europe; Viking raids. They blundered; they killed indiscriminately. And with each attack the stories grew. It �s a though the gates of hell had been
thrown open. Their leaders were
legendary even in their own time. Ivar
the boneless, Erik the red, Harold blue tooth; men who made their name through savagery. Our investigators are setting out to discover
the world they lived in. They �ll build a
picture of a culture steepe3d in bloodshed and yet highly sophisticated. They�ll reconstruct the wood fortress of Harold
Blue tooth; first king of all the Vikings.
They�ll find the hidden traces of a warlord city buried beneath modern
streets. And they �ll examine the key piece
of technology that set the Vikings apart from all other forces. With these long ships the Vikings were able
to redraw the map of Europe. Ships likes these took Viking explorers like
Erik the red and Leif Erikson further than anyone had ever
gone before. Using the latest research
and graphic technology; we will rebuild an extraordinary civilization and bring
back the lost world of the Vikings.
|
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
The next bit:
01:26 - 02:32: Killers,
bandits, barbarians, pagans. Though the
Viking culture died out more than a thousand years ago; it �s reputation
lives. Investigators Jonathan Foyle and Helena
Hamrow want to uncover the truth about these extraordinary warriors and the
world they came from. Helena Hamrow is
an archaeologist from the university
of Oxford and studies Europe�s ancient cultures. One of the genuine great mysteries about this
period is why the Vikings emerged when they did. What made them suddenly want to raid and
ultimately colonize in the way that they did.
Jonathan Foyle is an architectural historian. He decodes buildings as a way of
understanding the cultures that produced them.
Part of the Viking experience is living with the raw material the earth
and the fire and the wind and the water.
They �re very much people who live with the elements.
|
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
OK the next bit 02:32 - 04:12
Historians
put a precise date on when the Viking campaign of terror started: 793 AD.
They began with an act that devastated sacrilege. Jonathan has traveled to Lindisfarne on the
coast of north eastern England. A monastery stood here. In its time one of Christianities most sacred
and celebrated shrines. We �ve inherited
a picture of the Vikings as being blood thirsty savage pirates, and that
reputation was born in Lindisfarne. Word of what the Vikings did here would
spread quickly throughout Europe. Richard Oram explains. This is the first attack on a major, major
centre. This is the place where all hell
is let loose for the first time. And psychologically
this was the one that pushed people over the edge of believing that apocalypse
was on them. The attack was a surprise. The first anyone knew of the Vikings was when
their long ships appeared on the horizon.
And for the monks at the monastery; the very idea that their sanctuary
should be attacked was beyond belief.
Yet as Jonathan finds out it �s clear that the Vikings knew exactly what
they were doing. So what�s in it for the
Vikings? Loot, movable wealth to start
with; all the nice bits of blingy metal working things like that. They �re also after slaves. Slaves are a great commodity. The monastery was famed for its wealth and
its treasures. Its only protection was
faith; the belief that no one would dare desecrate holy ground.
By the way check it: In bold is what I �m not sure of.
|
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
The next bit:
04:12 - 05:24
They don �t
have defenses; this is a monastery. So presumably
they have a wall around the monastic enclosure something maybe like that. They �ve got, yes, a boundary that runs round
the whole place; it marks out the sacred place on the interior from the world
outside. But it �s really just a demarcation
line. Climbing to the highest point on
the Island; Jonathan and Richard try to build
a picture of the community that the Vikings set about destroying. Well, what would the Vikings have seen here
well over a thousand years ago? Well
absolutely nothing like this. None of
the stone buildings that you see now; nothing at all of that kind. And of course there �s no other houses here;
this is a monastic community. But where
you �ve got the Parish church across there, and the priory church here; this
would have been the site of the monastery sacked by the Vikings. But instead of stone buildings think mainly
of timber. And this is how the simple wooden
structures of Lindisfarne would have looked on
that day in 793. A model of Christian
simplicity; these modest buildings nevertheless contained a treasure trove of
riches. Making them a perfect target for
the heathen Vikings. |
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
Have to go, I might to the rest tomorrow. |
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
05:24 - 06:52:
This is a
place that �s poorly defended that �s made of flammable material and it wouldn �t
have taken much effort for the Vikings; 3 or 4 or 5 ship loads of men with axes
to come and take apart this entire... Absolutely not, there �s nothing here to
resist them and if they had a will to destroy they could have easily just
raised it from the face of the Earth.
Viking attacks were fast. Approach
at speed then strike, kill, plunder, burn.
Lindisfarne was left in flames and the
blueprint for a Viking raid was set. The
monk; Alkrin who was at the emperor�s court over in Europe
is writing letters of condolence; he �s heard about the terrible things that
have happened here. And so basically it
gets put down in a written record and that fixes it for all time as "The
great event". Now what �s their
opinion of these fair haired strangers causing so much damage? They must have been petrified. Well basically they �re just looking on them
as the hordes of antichrist. This is a
Pagan force; they �re slaughtering God �s men.
They �re utterly barbaric. They
are ruthless blood thirsty killers. The Lindisfarne raid was the first of many. But where did the Vikings come from? Where did they return with their spoils? Archeologist Helene Hamrow is in the Swedish
capital Stockholm on the trail of the looted
Christian relics that came from Lindisfarne
and elsewhere.
|
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
and 06:52 - 09:09:
She wants
to find out about the Viking homeland and the culture that produced that
savagery. At the national museum, she
meets with curator Kit Anderson to see the loot for herself. We have quite a lot of objects; objects from
the Arabic world there, Western European objects. How did they get to Sweden? If we have unique objects; if they come from
a very special context like a church or a monastery or something like that;
then you would think that it would be plunder.
That is also a unique object and that must have been a result of
plunder. It looks suspiciously like the
top of a Bishop �s crosier. Yes it
is. We have to imagine that some poor
Irish Bishop was mugged and his crosier taken from him. Yes, like some sort of souvenir. This sacred symbol of a Bishop �s authority
stands in stark contrast to many of the other finds. Among the museums most prized possessions;
are numerous swords; the most prestigious of all battle weapons; the blade of a
long sword could be worth up to as many as 16 dairy cows. A sword wielding warrior was a man of the
highest status. Behind the scenes at the
museum; Kit shows Helene more disturbing archeological remains. Evidence of not just animals but Human
sacrifice. This is part of a skull and
skeletons. A grave containing 3
individuals; 2 of them with their head chopped off; so they must have been
Human sacrifice. How do we know they
were sacrificed? Because, there you can
see it on the bones actually. So there
some cut marks on the vertebrae: good heavens.
Human sacrifice obviously would have been quite a sort of shocking
practice to the early Christians. well
it must have been. I mean this is
obviously suggestive of quite a different kind of ideology and world view, and
why did they ??? Were these people
criminals or had they done something wrong, were they being punished? No I don �t think so, that was the highest
offering you could give the Gods. So if
you wanted to go one better than a horse or a cow you would actually sacrifice
a maybe slave or a ... Yes. Human
sacrifices were part of the burial of a great warrior or Chief. Much of what we know about...
|
17 Sep 2009
|
|
wolfy
|
The only problem I have is at 08:48: "and why dig around" / dink around" / "and why did they crown" / dig a crown" - I can �t quite get it and none of those suggestions make sense it just what I hear.
Check the spelling of the names, but I �m pretty sure of the rest of it. I did it pretty quickly so there may be some words I missed. One new word for me "blingy" - slang for shinny.
|
17 Sep 2009
|
|
douglas
|
I think she asks "...and why did it incur? Were these people...... |
17 Sep 2009
|
|
1
2
Next >
|