|
ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Grammar and Linguistics > adverbs when there is a perfect infinitive
adverbs when there is a perfect infinitive
|
tachitorres
|
adverbs when there is a perfect infinitive
|
|
Hello to everyone! I need some help from you all!! Which one is correct?
1. I should have already told her
or
2. I should already have told her
I have always been taught that adverbs alsways go afer the first auxiliary, but the second option also sounds good to me.
Thanks in advance. Have a nice weekend!! |
1 May 2010
|
|
|
|
lovemykids
|
|
Hi!! I go for option 1,
Adverbs go before the main verb or after the verb to be.
HAVE A GREAT WEEKEND! |
1 May 2010
|
|
|
lshorton99
|
|
Sorry! I �d have to say number 2 - it �s much more natural-sounding and follows the rules about adverbs going after the first auxiliary verb (should is a modal auxiliary). The first answer sounds wrong!
|
1 May 2010
|
|
|
L. habach
|
|
I should have already told her is the right answer |
1 May 2010
|
|
|
yanogator
|
|
Ishorton99 is right (as usual). "Should � is the first auxilliary, and "already" should be after it, or at the end, so your options are
I should already have told her.
I should have told her already.
Bruce |
1 May 2010
|
|
|
ccchangch
|
|
Yes, number 2 is the correct sentence.
The adverb comes after the first auxiliary (e.g. are,has, don �t, should, have)
subject + auxiliary (1) + adverb + or auxiliary (2)+ main verb
The visitors are just leaving.
Andrew has always liked Jessica.
We don �t often go out in the evening.
You should never take unnecessary risks.
The pictures have definitely been stolen.
If there is no auxiliary, the the adverb comes before the main verb, e.g. hate, left.
Has Andrew always liked Jessica?
|
1 May 2010
|
|
|
|
|
lovemykids
|
|
I sometimes feel that the forum is rather competitive. We are all trying to help. That �s all. There are thousands of teachers here that perhaps don �t share your opinion Bruce, or other teacher�s opinion about a topic. Try not to be so arrogant when answering. I hope you don �t get mad. I �m just trying to be honest and say what I think.
Regards! |
2 May 2010
|
|
|
yanogator
|
|
I thought I was just being informative. I apologize if I sounded arrogant. I �m definitely not angry about your observation "lovemykids".
Bruce |
2 May 2010
|
|
|
lshorton99
|
Hey lovemykids - I don �t think people here are competitive or arrogant - we all just love English and debates about English. The questions people post here are the highlight of my day because they make me think! I sent Bruce a hug because he said that I was right, something I �ve been trying to tell my students is always the case for years! English is such a interesting language because sometimes there are no right and wrong answers - it falls under common usag- that I know everyone �s input is valuable!
Have a lovely Sunday and I �ll send you a hug too! 
|
2 May 2010
|
|
|
viccxx
|
|
We are just splitting hairs here I think but this is not a case of two auxiliary verbs as ccchangch said. It is a modal verb (should) followed by a bare perfect infinitive (have told). It is best not to split the infinitive. So, the adverb should go just before the infinitive or just after.
That said, I agree that "Should have arleady told" sounds more natural than "should arleady have told". Grammatically though, it is wrong. It all cames down to the infinitive: are you a splitter or not? I had teachers that would cringe to see infinitives split like that and other that said the rule is obsolete since everybody splits them
|
2 May 2010
|
|
1
2
Next >
|
