Welcome to
ESL Printables, the website where English Language teachers exchange resources: worksheets, lesson plans,  activities, etc.
Our collection is growing every day with the help of many teachers. If you want to download you have to send your own contributions.

 


 

 

 

ESL Forum:

Techniques and methods in Language Teaching

Games, activities and teaching ideas

Grammar and Linguistics

Teaching material

Concerning worksheets

Concerning powerpoints

Concerning online exercises

Make suggestions, report errors

Ask for help

Message board

 

ESL forum > Ask for help > Please Help!    

Please Help!



imanito
Morocco

Please Help!
 
Hello everyone!
I need some help with the following sentence:

Many TV shows are duplicates of those of other foreign countries �

Is the possessive case at the end correct?

27 May 2010      





Babs1966
France

No, as it �s not related to possessive.

Your sentence should be :
"Many TV shows are duplicates of those of other foreign countries."
 
as "Countries" is a plural of country on that case Wink
 
Good day ;)
 
Babs

27 May 2010     



dennismychina
China

How about, �of those from other countries�. And are they duplications or are they translated?

In that case you might say; �Many local TV shows are translations of those from other countries�.

Or �translated from those of other countries�.

Enjoy.

27 May 2010     



imanito
Morocco

Thank you so much guys fro your help Handshake

27 May 2010     



Babs1966
France

Just a little add-on ... Many TV shows are adapted shows from other countries ;)

27 May 2010     



Zora
Canada

To answer the first question... "yes" it is needed. It is not simply a plural form. It �s the plural and the possessive form.

The full sentence would be:

Many TV shows are duplicates of those of other foreign countries � programs/shows. - this part is not necessary though because it is understood and would be considered repetitive if added on.

27 May 2010     



magneto
Greece

You don �t need the possessive ( �) here. Possession is indicated by of. Dennismychina �s suggestions are also correct.

27 May 2010