Welcome to
ESL Printables, the website where English Language teachers exchange resources: worksheets, lesson plans,  activities, etc.
Our collection is growing every day with the help of many teachers. If you want to download you have to send your own contributions.

 


 

 

 

ESL Forum:

Techniques and methods in Language Teaching

Games, activities and teaching ideas

Grammar and Linguistics

Teaching material

Concerning worksheets

Concerning powerpoints

Concerning online exercises

Make suggestions, report errors

Ask for help

Message board

 

ESL forum > Ask for help > A question in conditional 2    

A question in conditional 2



Pretty3
Saudi Arabia

A question in conditional 2
 
Hi,
 
I need an urgent help.
 
What is the correct verb of be after she in this sentence :
 
If she ( be )........ you  , she would visit her.
 
 
Thanks a lot in advance,
Pretty

19 Feb 2011      





moravc
Czech Republic

If she was you, she would visit her. = "If + past simple, pronoun would verb."

If + present simple, pronoun will verb. = Conditional I
If + past simple, pronoun WOULD verb = Conditional II
If + past perfect, pronoun WOULD HAVE + past participle = Conditional III

19 Feb 2011     



Pretty3
Saudi Arabia

Was or were ???
 
What about this sentence too
If Shakespeare ( be ).... alive now, he would write in an easy English .???

19 Feb 2011     



Panteleimon
Greece

well 
native speakers would say was
but grammar books might probably say IF SHakespeare WERE
i hate grammar... but i �m an english teacher in greece
how can that BE????
also check http://www.huffingtonpost.com/al-eisele/if-shakespeare-were-still_b_190868.html
Clap

19 Feb 2011     



anitarobi
Croatia

As far as I �ve been taught, were is preferred, although none is completely rejected and incorrect. Were is preferred for all persons only in this instance (normally, it is always I was, he/she/it was, but in if - If I were you... If he were me... etc.)
Take a look at this:
 

EXCEPTION If I were ...

In the Present Unreal Conditional, the form "was" is not considered grammatically correct. In written English or in testing situations, you should always use "were." However, in everyday conversation, "was" is often used.

Examples:

  • If he were French, he would live in Paris.
  • If she were rich, she would buy a yacht.
  • I would play basketball if I were taller.
  • I would buy that computer if it were cheaper.
  • I would buy that computer if it was cheaper. Not Correct (But often said in conversation.)

from http://www.englishpage.com/conditional/presentconditional.html

19 Feb 2011     



tulpen25
Netherlands

I would always say were.

19 Feb 2011     



Pretty3
Saudi Arabia

What about the verb to be after  they  , we   or you ????? was or were ???????

19 Feb 2011     



amyi
France

Hello!  I �m a native speaker, and I would say
If I were / If you were / If he were / If we were / If they were
�Was� can be heard after I or he, she, it -  this is accepted and in common usage, but not as correct as using �were�.
Hope this helps!

19 Feb 2011     



almaz
United Kingdom

Was or were? It �s a question of style, preference etc. But if we just take were, for example, I �d say we �re looking here at a subjunctive expressing a hypothesis (but unreal/contrary to fact) and, as a relatively rare beast, its usage tends to be more formal nowadays.

Incidentally, one way of determining the subjunctive in English after �if � is through inversion (just drop the �if �): 

Were I the Prime Minister, I would... �makes grammatical sense, but 
Was I the Prime Minister, I would... � doesn �t.

19 Feb 2011     



ELOJOLIE274
France

normally it should be "were" but now you can hear "was" especially in Am. English.

I teach my pupils "if I/you/he/she/we/they WERE you, ... would do..." is always correct, and it �s the structure you will find in most texts, but "if I/he/she WAS you, ... would do... " can be said and you will hear it quite often in TV series...

19 Feb 2011